WAPDA distances itself from proposed ‘Out of Box’ NHP solution

ISLAMABAD: The Water and Power Development Authority (WAPDA) has reportedly distanced itself from the proposal of out of box solution of current controversy on Net Hydel Profit (NHP), Newzshewz has learnt reliably.
The issue of NHP is now at the table of Minister for Planning, Development and Special Initiative, Ahsan Iqbal who is heading a committee.
According to WAPDA, the Council of Common Interests (CCI) based on Article 161(2) of the Constitution determines the sale rate at Bus Bar of hydel power stations. However, calculating NHP has been tricky due to conflicting claims and interpretations of the Kazi Committee Methodology. Various attempts have been made to resolve this, including ad-hoc payments and arbitration, but a long-term solution remains unresolved ;(ii) after power sector restructuring and becoming NEPRA licencee, WAPDA paid Rs. 6 billion annually to the Govt, of KP as NHP until FY 2014-15, which was later uncapped at Rs. 1.10 per kWh by NEPRA in FY 2015-16, following GoKP’s request ;(iii) for settlement of all previous NHP arrears by making payments of Rs.70 billion infour instalment and notification of uncapped NHP rate of Rs. 1.10/kWh an MoU was signed between Govt. of Pakistan and Govt. of KP on February 25, 2016. The MoU was also approved by CCI on February 29, 2016 and later the settlement of Govt. of Punjab’s claims of Rs.82.71 billion and payment of regular NHP at uncapped rate was too agreed and approved by CCI on December 16, 2016 ;(iv) despite paying NHP at the uncapped rate that was further enhanced by NEPRA from Rs.1.10/kWh to Rs.1.155/kWh in FY 2017-18 and CCI’s overriding of its earlier decision of Jan 1991 regarding KCM through approving the said MoU, the GoKP again raised the issue in CCI and asked for payment of NHP as per KCM ;(v) considering Deputy Chairman – Planning Commission’s report (suggesting WAPDA’s replacement with CPPA-G for NHP obligations), ECC’s decision of January 24, 2019 (Power Division to lead efforts to secure financing for NHP payments to provinces) and Finance Minister’s remarks during 49th CCI meeting (Finance Division is working on clearing NHP outstanding dues of KPK and Punjab, and in future CPPA-G will directly pay NHP to provinces), the Power Division and CPPA-G are in better position to propose an out of solution for NHP payment ;(vi) WAPDA doesn’t profit from selling power at hydel stations, as NHP is a pass through item and makes the NHP payment to provinces as per government guidelines and
regulations ;(vii) WAPDA’s outstanding recovery from CPPA-G against power sales invoices has sharply increased due to delayed payments, hindering WAPDA’s ability to make timely NHP payments to provinces, despite regular billing at NEPRA-determined rates. Currently, WAPDA has to pay NHP of Rs.49.565 billion to GoKP and Rs. 114.584 billion (including Rs. 13.617 billion as NHP arrears) to GoPb.
WAPDA is of the view that Power Division and CPPA-G are in better position to propose an out of box solution for NHP payment.
Power Division (Power Planning & Monitoring Company) : PPMC has offered the following comments: (i) Article 161(2) of Pakistan’s 1973 Constitution requires that net profits from hydroelectric power generation be paid to the province where the power station is located, calculated by deducting operating expenses from bus bar revenue, and explicitly excludes Net Hydel Profit (NHP) as a pass-through cost to electricity consumers ;(ii) KCM calculates NHP by aggregating power generation income, but this approach, formulated in 1985-86 was based on a unified and unbundled WAPDA being the sole
power producer and distributor. Now, Pakistan’s energy landscape has been changed significantly including WAPDA’s unbundling, emergence of IPPS, and shifts in the power mix wherein hydro power contributes 27% (approx.) ;(iii) NHP payments should be made through the federal budget or covered by WAPDA’s profits from hydropower sales, rather than consumers ;(iv) commenting on GoKP’s proposal, PPMC is of the view that the transfer of hydropower plants to provinces is governed by the Power Generation policies of 1995 and 2015 that is applicable to BOOT-based IPP projects developed within a province by private sponsors. The WAPDA Act lacks provisions for transferring hydropower plants constructed under its mandate to the provinces, and its projects are primarily financed
through PSDP, donor loans, and internal funds, after accounting for NHP ;(v) NHP payment through ESCROW account, does not align with the legal and regulatory framework and the constitutional scheme ;(vi) regarding wheeling of power from PEDO and wheeling charges determination, B2B electricity supply through wheeling arrangements will be integrated into IGCEP and TSEP under the CTBCM Directive No. 7 ;(vii) NEPRA’s periodical regime, determined water usage charges should be reviewed based on the mechanism applied in various countries.
Government of Sindh: The Provincial Government submitted ;(i) proposal regarding transferring Hydro Electric Stations to the respective provinces in lieu of NHP requires clarification as presently no hydro power station is managed in IPPs mode.
It further stated that the hydro-electric power generation is a bi-product of “Water Reservoir Projects
(Dams)”. While framing any such proposal, the basic purpose of construction of these reservoirs be considered and IRSA be included in the committee.
Govt. of Sindh is of the view that transfer of Hydro Electric Stations to provinces requires careful consideration of the primary purpose of water reservoir projects. To ensure a comprehensive approach, it is suggested to include representatives from IRSA, Finance Division, and Economic Affairs Division in the committee to provide technical, financial, and economic expertise.
Govt. of Sindh has reiterated its earlier stance on NHP, reflected in the minutes of 49th CCI
Meeting which is as follows “Chief Minister, Punjab endorsed views of DCPC and asked for early payment of Rs. 58 billion dues of NHP owned to Punjab. The Chief Minister, Sindh, endorsed the NHP claim of Chief Ministers of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Punjab being constitutional. He, however, did not
support increase in tariff and its passing on to consumers. He said that since profit was utilized
by WAPDA it should now be accounted for”.
Ends